1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

Decrease player count.

Discussion in 'Discussion' started by SoMuchWinning, Jan 27, 2014.

?

Should this be implemented?

Poll closed Apr 6, 2014.

  1. Yes

    15 vote(s)
    53.6%

  2. No

    9 vote(s)
    32.1%

  3. Maybe

    4 vote(s)
    14.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...
Page 1 of 5
  1. SoMuchWinning

    SoMuchWinning Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,462
    Ratings:
    +1,568
    I feel like Mc-War has so many people now, it honestly throws CoD feeling back. Perhaps, we could decrease server slot number to 40, it would be closer to CoD, spawncampers would get less kills, there wouldn't be that effecient glitching, game would require more teamwork, server spawns wouldn't lag as much and it would have less servers empty. Look at how many pros there are. I feel like they should decrease player count, because it oftenly gets crowded and such. Let's face it- CoD can have a maximum of 18 people, but at least, we could have 40 people. It would be possible ro emp and nuke, but it would require more skill and patience. This could be next large step to CoD similarity.
    THIS IS NOT AN IDEA, IT IS A MARKED DISCUSSION, SO PLEASE DO NOT REQUEST MOVING.
     
    • Agree x 6
    • Like x 4
    • Neutral x 3
    • Dislike x 2
    • Disagree x 1
    #1 SoMuchWinning, Jan 27, 2014
  2. MrMustache456

    MrMustache456 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2014
    Messages:
    180
    Ratings:
    +3
    Good suggestion
     
    #2 MrMustache456, Jan 27, 2014
  3. onepunchmeme

    onepunchmeme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,101
    Ratings:
    +541
    Yes, yes, I totally agree on this. Also, this can distribute players more evenly throughout the servers.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #3 onepunchmeme, Jan 27, 2014
  4. ChickenNinja

    ChickenNinja Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2013
    Messages:
    1,331
    Ratings:
    +335
    I like this because it always gets a bit too crowded and too easy. With less people it will be a bit more challenging and decrease lag.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #4 ChickenNinja, Jan 27, 2014
  5. Verasium

    Verasium Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2013
    Messages:
    1,903
    Ratings:
    +345
    It would spread out players more evenly... allowing War to fill up faster and have less empty servers which they're paying for... I like it, Credo.
     
    #5 Verasium, Jan 27, 2014
  6. onepunchmeme

    onepunchmeme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,101
    Ratings:
    +541
    I tried playing on server 1 with 70 people...
    Total chaos, unbearable lag.
    Never doing it again.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    #6 onepunchmeme, Jan 27, 2014
  7. _PublicEnemy_

    _PublicEnemy_ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2013
    Messages:
    1,387
    Ratings:
    +292
    I love the chaos on server one.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Funny Funny x 3
    #7 _PublicEnemy_, Jan 27, 2014
  8. Darkchaosknight

    Darkchaosknight Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    3,200
    Ratings:
    +955
    Interesting idea. I honestly think 40 is to low. 50-60 is perfect as 70 is far to many and 40 is far to spread apart to even get a killstreak.
     
    #8 Darkchaosknight, Jan 27, 2014
  9. onepunchmeme

    onepunchmeme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,101
    Ratings:
    +541
    I can nuke even when only 30-40 people are on, in fact it's not that hard to get an EMP.
     
    #9 onepunchmeme, Jan 27, 2014
  10. MrCowlick

    MrCowlick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    3,490
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    This is a great idea. Harder to nuke. More full servers. And less glitching, because you get less kills doing it.
    Love this idea. +1
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Creative Creative x 1
    #10 MrCowlick, Jan 27, 2014
  11. GreySwordz

    GreySwordz Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    1,976
    Ratings:
    +322
    This is an idea...
     
    #11 GreySwordz, Jan 27, 2014
  12. marcel18167

    marcel18167 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2013
    Messages:
    906
    Ratings:
    +241
    true story
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Pointless Pointless x 1
    #12 marcel18167, Jan 27, 2014
  13. F1r3tar

    F1r3tar Highly Established Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2013
    Messages:
    8,931
    Ratings:
    +1,826
    This is a great idea. Server 1 is usually always full and some of the other servers are just begging to have more players on. Decreasing the amount of players per server would help to fill up other servers instead of just server 1. Plus, the other servers rarely ever get 70 players on at one time too.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #13 F1r3tar, Jan 27, 2014
  14. slider8558

    slider8558 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Ratings:
    +24
    I would love this!
    The only downside is that servers are typically paid for on a basis of RAM and not slots. That means that if we wanted the same number of total slots, it would cost more to run the servers.
    Maybe just play on less crowded servers?
     
    #14 slider8558, Jan 27, 2014
  15. SoMuchWinning

    SoMuchWinning Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2013
    Messages:
    6,462
    Ratings:
    +1,568
    I already do that, however, my home server is 1.
     
    #15 SoMuchWinning, Jan 27, 2014
  16. MrCowlick

    MrCowlick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    3,490
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    When you create a server, you get a folder that manages all the basic thing like, IP, and world seed. It also allows you to choose how many player slots you can have.
     
    #16 MrCowlick, Jan 27, 2014
  17. joeymast99

    joeymast99 j chillin

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    921
    Ratings:
    +477
    Personally I love it most when there are full servers of 70 people. Nuking it is much more exhilarating and it is always a fun experience. I think the severs are fine the way they are now. And decreasing the player count will make it too calm.
    I think it be best to keep the servers at 70 player caps.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Neutral Neutral x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
    #17 joeymast99, Jan 27, 2014
  18. slider8558

    slider8558 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Ratings:
    +24
    Correct me if I'm wrong, but these servers aren't hosted by chaploo. They are more than likely hosted by a company.
     
    #18 slider8558, Jan 27, 2014
  19. joeymast99

    joeymast99 j chillin

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    921
    Ratings:
    +477
    [​IMG]
    Kill me. Bye bye beloved full servers :'(
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    #19 joeymast99, Jan 27, 2014
  20. MrCowlick

    MrCowlick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    3,490
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    They are hosted by a company. But they have access to the mainframe. Thats how they edit things. They have access to all the server files. All the server hosting does is give them DDoS protection, and make it easier for them.
     
    #20 MrCowlick, Jan 27, 2014
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 1 of 5
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Recognizing the decrease in players. MC-WarZ Mar 5, 2017
Decrease In Players Discussion Jun 11, 2016
Idea Decrease Max Server Size. Please. Capture the Flag May 25, 2020
Idea /tpa Access Booster time decreasement MC-WarZ Dec 6, 2019
Looking For Feedback - Decreased Flag Pickup Delay #3 + Halloween rotation Capture the Flag Oct 20, 2019
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...