1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

Decrease player count.

Discussion in 'Discussion' started by SoMuchWinning, Jan 27, 2014.

?

Should this be implemented?

Poll closed Apr 6, 2014.
  1. Yes

    53.6%
  2. No

    32.1%
  3. Maybe

    14.3%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...
  1. slider8558

    slider8558 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Ratings:
    +24
    Re-read my post.
    If they want to have the same amount of TOTAL slots it will cost more as you pay for servers based on the RAM.
     
  2. BrawlerAce

    BrawlerAce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,616
    Ratings:
    +2,113
    Welp. GG NO RE
    When an admin votes, it's usually over :V
    Especially when the coder votes V:
    Anyways, I used to really like the full servers like server 1. These days though, they're filled with explosions, rayguns, crossbows, etc. It makes it less fun, since you're going to be slaughtered by a raygun or crossbow bolt unless you're an MLG pro. (which I'm not v: )
    Servers that have 30-40ish people are perfect for me. If there's a raygun or crossbow user, there's only one, and you can easily gun him down and focus on fighting with actual guns. Me gusta.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. MrCowlick

    MrCowlick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    3,490
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    Well this is bona get added. Now that Orange451 has voted for it. And he is the coder. Sorry @joeymast99, looks like you are gonna have to nuke with less people on.
     
  4. joeymast99

    joeymast99 j chillin

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    921
    Ratings:
    +477
    70 was always [donor] heaven for me. But as long as it's 50+ players I'm happy. 40 is way too low.
    If they do decide to do this, maybe they make a certain portion of the servers 70 players and the other half is 50? :v
     
  5. teawithchoco

    teawithchoco Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2013
    Messages:
    6,758
    Ratings:
    +844
    Less players = less raging = less lag = I'm up for it !
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  6. BrawlerAce

    BrawlerAce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,616
    Ratings:
    +2,113
    I'd say majority are 30-40, maybe servers 1-3 are 50+ players. :V
    Because sometimes. having 50 players can be pretty damn fun.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. MrCowlick

    MrCowlick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    3,490
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    I don't think they would bother doing that to be honest. Very few people here actually want the server at 70 people.
     
  8. joeymast99

    joeymast99 j chillin

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    921
    Ratings:
    +477
    There's no doubt I can nuke with less players on but it's like:
    10 kill nuke, meh
    27 player nuke, HOLY ****ING ****.
    XD
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. MrCowlick

    MrCowlick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    3,490
    Ratings:
    +1,299
    What this man said. Less people= less lag and less raging.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. BrawlerAce

    BrawlerAce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,616
    Ratings:
    +2,113
    You have a point, nukes on server 1 get you like 30 kills :L
    But I would still rather have smaller lobbies, 20 kill nukes are fine... :V
     
    • Like Like x 1
  11. joeymast99

    joeymast99 j chillin

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    921
    Ratings:
    +477
    Server 1 nuke:


    Server 13 nuke:


    :V V:
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. BrawlerAce

    BrawlerAce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,616
    Ratings:
    +2,113
    >off topic
    You hate the Iso, yet you're using it :L
    >on topic
    From what I see there, seems like server 1 nukes and server 13 nukes are similar- oh wait, server 1 was on Shipment, doesn't count. But it's only like 5 kills lost... it's ok :V
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. slider8558

    slider8558 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Ratings:
    +24
    Usually on 35 player servers I get like 6 kills from nukes :frowning:
    Maybe I should start playground on servers with more people...
    Lolnope
     
  14. joeymast99

    joeymast99 j chillin

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    921
    Ratings:
    +477
    The iso video was old, I've improved my behavior.
    As for shipment you have a point, but this was when the enemy team had 35 players stable :V
     
    • Like Like x 1
  15. BBSlayer5150

    BBSlayer5150 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,641
    Ratings:
    +362
    You know, I am really torn on the idea. I just am really used to there being 70 players, and changing would be less hectic, which I like.
    I have an idea to sit both player's opinions, meaning those who like large servers, and those who want smaller ones. What if server 1, 2, and 3 were the only servers with 70 players, and the rest are decreased to [insert amount of maximum players here]? The first three are the most popular, at least they are most of the time close to capping (55-70 players). The first servers can be known as the "Big Team Battle" servers, where they play certain larger maps suited for more players. The other servers would vary in maps, mostly ranging from small to medium, with a few large ones thrown in here and there. Tell me what you think of this. I would favor doing this instead of decreasing EVERY server. Best of both worlds.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  16. BrawlerAce

    BrawlerAce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,616
    Ratings:
    +2,113
    I like this idea. Good for both sides, and satisfies (almost) everyone.
     
  17. tallscot

    tallscot sceptiiiiiii

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    6,414
    Ratings:
    +1,571
    Make it 55. This wouldn't be a high number, or a low one. Not UP, or OP.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. slider8558

    slider8558 Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2013
    Messages:
    284
    Ratings:
    +24
    The more I think about it the more I'm against it.
    Honestly if you hate the player count, move servers.
     
  19. ZapCrusher

    ZapCrusher Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2013
    Messages:
    2,994
    Ratings:
    +627
    I think Joey is just trying to keep his easy cbow nukes form across the map :V
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. DarSwag

    DarSwag Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2013
    Messages:
    1,320
    Ratings:
    +130
    This would be better since ffa wouls be 39v1 and not 69v1. Hello noob heaven.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Recognizing the decrease in players. MC-WarZ Mar 5, 2017
Decrease In Players Discussion Jun 11, 2016
Idea Decrease Max Server Size. Please. Capture the Flag May 25, 2020
Idea /tpa Access Booster time decreasement MC-WarZ Dec 6, 2019
Looking For Feedback - Decreased Flag Pickup Delay #3 + Halloween rotation Capture the Flag Oct 20, 2019
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...