/truce

This seems like a good idea, in my opinion it sounds hard to code. But I'm no coder so don't take my word for it . I like this idea. +1

 

I'm not sure if I would like this, imagine 2 teams of friends, they would probably truce with each other. Maybe we can limit the amount of truces so that won't happen.

 

They could make it able to only truce enough times to fill a team. So if you had a team of three you could only truce one other player. If you had a team of two you then could truce only two other players.

 

I don't think this should be implemented -1 For the reasons
-Too hard too code
-Players would abuse it
-Kinda useless

 

You've thought well on this,
but the /truce command I actually almost the team command. The only difference with teams is that they spawn together. I think it would be a bit too OP, otherwise they would have add bigger teams for fpsHG.

 

It's not too hard to code, just make it exactly the same as the /friend system in WarZ
Just make it so that you can't un-friend people because that **** is evil -_-

Players would not abuse it if this was how it worked:
You can only truce if you are not already in a team (so you can truce after your team dies on you)
You can only truce with 1 other person

Stick to those guidlines and it's exactly the opposite of everything you said it was EBKN...
It's easy to code (i code, i would know)
You can't abuse it if you stick to the above guidelines
And it's not useless, I would love ./truce

 

I think its pointless. This is the exact same thing as teaming. If you missed the deadline, then you missed the deadline. -1

 

Would you be able to do this within the game? This would be different from teaming if you did, because you could break the truce at any time, and you can't do ./team invite while in the game.

 

Yes, this command was meant for players that did not have enough time to create a team before the match started.

It would be /truce in-game instead of /team invite because in the hunger games each district had original team mates. They worked together and would not kill each other, since they could win the game if they both lived. They could also make a truce in the match and break that truce. Seen in The Hunger Game and The Hunger Game Catching Fire.

 

Then I see no problem with this command, other than it could be a slight pain to code.

 

Breaking trucs shouldn't be a thing...
It should be like a request:

//truce tallscot

Krcoon would like to team with you! [//truce accept or //truce deny]

//truce accept

You are now in a truce with Krcoon!
If one of you wins, you both win!

//truce deny

You denied a truce with Krcoon!

And on my screen again:

Tallscotnaccepted your truce!
If one of you wins, you both win,

Or

Tallscot denied your truce!

And you can only truce with one person per game, if you don't have any teammates, and //t c works for truces too...

That was my updated idea, put in a semi graphic format for your reading 'pleasure'...

 

You should be able to break a truce, that's what a truce is. It's not the same thing as a team, it's more of allying someone. It's not permanent.

 

What if when you break the truce it says TRUCE WAS BROKEN and you get 15 seconds before your ally can start damaging you...
I just don't want to see it become like /friend on warz. Everyone friends you then tps then unfriends and steals your stuff...
This causes rage and makes players dislike the server and even leave...

 

I agree with Tallscot. In the show players broke their truces and here should be no different. A delay would be nice before breaking a truce. That way you can not do the quick betray tactic.