Napalm

If it's a killstreak, why does it cost 10000 credits?
And what killstreak do you need to activate the napalm?
I bit more information please.

 

It's an...interesting idea, but seems a bit OP, I mean, the entire enemy team down to 3.5 hearts? And it would kill them if they're below that amount of health, I take it?
other than that, I really don't feel like this concept is flushed out enough atm. :V
I'd advise more development.

 

I don't fully understand, if they burn until they are on 5 hearts, what if they are full health, it says damage from fire: 4 hearts, please explain this to me, I'm confused.

 

I agree on the OP part and I like the idea of having to unlock the kill streak. If you give some more info it is defiantly a +1 from me c:

 

The other day I was playing some Call of Duty and some kid said he hated the Napalm killstreak because he had a relative who died in a napalm... Having a nuke in a game is on the border for some but a Napalm is a bit extreme towards people's ethnicity and feelings... Unlike a nuke that kills instantly, Napalms actually stick to you in a jelly state and melt your skin at extreme temperatures. The jelly and fire itself are extremely hard to remove (Even if removed you will be permanently scarred and burned, the burns may kill you even if you get the material off) meaning that you will keep burning therefore making it a slow, painful, horrendous, torture of a death.. Thus, Napalms and other chemical weapons of the sort are seen as controversial. Using that logic, I'm not sure if Mc-war needs something that controversial.

 

The same could be said about flamethrowers, which launch burning gasoline or ethanol onto their targets. I'd say that would have a similar effect to napalm. The thing is, nobody actually bothers looking up how flamethrorwers work. The same could probably be said about napalm (and nukes, because lighting plutonium on fire is helpful).