Idea ELO Idea (Must be implemented)

What if you kill 6 full diamonds, but you had 3 teammate online that weren't there? I don't see it working out too well. And people with extremely high ELO losing a lot to people with lower ELO balances things out, and gives them more ELO. I have to say it would be interesting, but I like ELO fine the way it is.

 

I see... But it would have to be coded so that it would be teammates in a certain area around you, not just on the server.
But this would be a nice feature.

 

I think there should be a timer, like if a friend shoots the enemy, a Countdown of 10 seconds starts, if you kill the enemy in the 10 seconds, your friend gets half of the elo and you get the other half of it.
And if 3 people shoots at the enemy and you kill it, you get 1/3 elo and ypur friend gets 1/3 elo each.

 

I actually like this.
Lets put this into a simple format.
Person who did the most damage within a 10 minute timer will get most of the ELO if that person indeed did most of the damage. This also counts for everybody who fought said person. Within a group of people, the ELO is divided up between the X number of people and X amount of damage each person did when that person died.

Now about the timer.
If someone is fighting them, they have a 10 minute timer that will proc for 10 minutes, having like "Give person base % ELO when enemy dies". If that timer goes up, then you won't get any ELO after the time period.


TL;DR, Person deals most damage, gets a cookie, no freeloading

 

1. I feel like it's ironic you're mad over getting 1v6'd.
2. I like the idea. Maybe something like the amount of friends you have within a 20 block radius of, so all of your team could get on and would be dead but you would still get ELO.

 

I like Pikmin's idea but I think the 10 minute timer is excessive. A lot happens in 10 minutes. Also, if you knew the player was going to die and you wanted as much ELO as possible, you could just keep spraying them or Barrett headshot them, without actually going for the kill.

To be honest, the whole ELO system is flawed for WarZ due to teams. I may be wrong, but I'm pretty sure ELO is a system designed to show skill in a 1v1 basis. Chess and Tennis tournaments, 1v1s on a kit server. When you have multiple teams fighting at once, everything gets messy and you can be sure that the ELO that was gained in that fight will not accurately represent who was the most skilled.

Personally, I'd like to bring back WarZ 21 with multiple game modes; 1v1, 2v2, 3v3, up to 8v8. ELO would be gained as normal, except it would be fair. And since everyone has 3/4, you wouldn't lose massive ELO to a full leather who didn't deserve the kill. That would be a true test of skill. I would actually be very interested to see who would get the highest ELO from that.

@Mario, thoughts?

 

the whoever did most damage gets most elo thing already existed - but the some of the guns w/ armor penetration broke this (too lazy to explain fully why).

can't necessarily do this without messing around with the code for a solid amount of time which is a significant waste of time.

 

Hmm, good point. Even though it seems like a nice idea, just how flawed ELO is in WarZ. In reality, ELO shouldn't even be in the current WarZ with the issue with teams. Edit: Just saw Mario's comment about the damage thingy.
The WarZ 21 with multiple gamemodes, yass. That would work out more normally than the current WarZ.

 

You know, this is why I completely disregard ELO. It is very confusing and it really doesn't matter for anything in game.

 

Funny cause you are the team that 69v1's

 

No. There shouldn't be. The teams that 69v1 like yours are going to get more rewards in addition to the higher elo they get from gangbanging single full d's. Please stop making threads like this that are imbalanced to benefit you.

 

I need ideas other than to split the ELO between who damaged the person. That didn't work out last time due to how the guns work w/ damaging people (armor penetration).