+3 Banned Accounts - Suggestion and Ideas

Although I personally like the idea, there are reasons why it is 3.

"It's 3 because it matches the amount of unbans that can be purchased. You can have up to 3 unappealed perm bans across accounts. Buying an unban is an unappealed perm ban". -Quoted from Putty.

 

WarZ has players that alt with hundreds of accounts js

Also vouch for @gamren 's post

 

But why let players evade at all? If you get perm banned, you shouldn't be allowed to play on the server. What's the point of banning players if your just going to let them evade the ban. Any player caught evading their 1st ban should be IP banned.

Give people one chance to buy an unban. Right now unbans are useless as players can just go on an alt rather than wasting money.

That's all assuming the brawl staff doesn't falsely ban players.

 

My personal leanings are if you've been given enough warnings to be banned in the first place then that's exactly what should happen. No alternate accounts etc. If you're banned, then you've had enough chances (for minor rule breaks that's 40 in 8 months). You can purchase an unban (which is also something I'm not totally pleased about but at least it brings in money), but that should be it.

 

If your brother gets banned, you just go in ts with him and prove that your 2 different people. That's how every other server does it.

 

The unbans are not useless. I personally as a WarZ player would much rather buy a $10 unban, then to buy a $27 account and buy it an $11 rank. It's $38 or $20 for a second unban. Even without purchasing a rank it would still be cheaper to buy an unban.

That's not how it works. This thread is referring to the fact that you get 3+ banned accounts and then you are prohibited from accessing the server on that IP. If Carnotauros' brother is to be banned, Carnotauros can continue to play on the server without any issues, however, if his brother is banned 3+ times, it will be an IP ban. Due to them both playing on the same IP, there is no way around this.

I for one oppose this idea due to the fact that there are always complications revolving around the legitimacy of bans, and seconds chances, and the amount of players that will now be banned because they already used their unbans. This would complicate matters and really will result in no improved system. If anything it will make things worse by making more players "forced" into alting, which will make other players complain that they should not be playing. There is just no need for this.

 

It kind of does give a benefit because most of the alting players on WarZ buy ranks.

While Brawl benefits from the money I still see that it is annoying to staff having to ban them constantly; it's also another reason why we should ban most VPNs imo.

People can just crack their own accounts / buy cheap alts for MUCH less than what Mojang prices them at. It's why most people didn't buy unbans because they can get 500 non-full access accounts from a seller for like $5.

 

Why I forgot about this I don't know ;-;
Especially considering the fact that I've used them. Still, I feel as though this is not needed.

 

That's true, but that's also no everybody. I think a second chance would enable people to learn from mistakes. Plus you could always try it out and if people abuse this, just remove it and its back to perm ban.

 

I mean, now that unbans are removed, I don't see why this idea shouldn't be added to be honest.

 

1. It generates money for Brawl.
2. It gives more players more chances to play, which makes the servers more populated.
3. It gives more leeway for people who either made a stupid mistake a couple years back and bought an unban, or who were false banned and cannot prove their innocence.

Even if they do come back quickly, they come back, and Brawl pockets a quick $10-$20 from the unban.

 

Then remove the first point that I made, the other two still apply.

 

"It gives more players a chance to play, making the servers more populated"
I'd rather have a less populated server full of legit players than a populated one full of hackers.

"Gives more leeway"
The whole point of this is to stop giving so much leeway. If you hack on the server you should be lucky to be given a second chance, period. If the server was more strict, there wouldn't be as many hackers as there are now *cough* triple

I get the "false ban" thing, but that could easily be avoided if you staff were able to screen share.......

 

I'll say to sum up, to bbuy unban that's Dumbnass. If someone banned and Has a lot of money?
s/he can To buy "unban fee" and i know there is Punish is Unable you to bbuy one, Its mostly need to be deleted, and its not the potential to buy it. and make from it alot of money