1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

Simple fix

Discussion in 'Ideas' started by Hitchens, Jul 1, 2017.

Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...
  1. Hitchens

    Hitchens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,392
    Ratings:
    +413
    Make shooting rogues a priority over cuffing them.

    (Handbook change)
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  2. SoCool21

    SoCool21 Bans Reports & Appeals Admin | McPvPer for Life <3

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,096
    Ratings:
    +2,517
    Does this mean you'd have to KOS any rogues?
     
  3. NickManEA

    NickManEA Build JMOD

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2015
    Messages:
    1,498
    Ratings:
    +717
    Discord:
    NickManEA#1421
    Why should this implemented?
     
  4. Hitchens

    Hitchens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,392
    Ratings:
    +413
    All rogues, yes

    Because now, teams refuse to fights sheriffs because they dont want to fight cuff cuff cuff sheriffs. It causes a lot of new problems. Not only does the playerbase go down like bushes aproval rating as players cant fight and thus logg off, but also, the sheriffs can now just go cuff noobs.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. Droiid

    Droiid Shutdown

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    547
    Ratings:
    +159
    Discord:
    Droiid#0609
    Also because the only way you go rogue is through an act of violence. If you are to attack someone, your going to get attacked back whether its from sheriffs or bounty hunters.
     
    • Like Like x 3
  6. JustFamouz

    JustFamouz Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2016
    Messages:
    112
    Ratings:
    +41
    +2
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. CrossBoone

    CrossBoone enjoy life

    Joined:
    May 29, 2015
    Messages:
    549
    Ratings:
    +139
    *Ahem* I think we can agree that this thread is brilliant.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. Fadaad8

    Fadaad8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    546
    Ratings:
    +140
    yea i kinda agree but what if its a (sheriff)1v4(bandits). its kinda hard to kill 4 people by yourself, cuffing two would get two out of the way, although cuffs are super annoying :/
     
  9. Hitchens

    Hitchens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,392
    Ratings:
    +413
    You shouldnt win a 1v4 unless you have insane skill and tactical abilities and now I dont mean rush and cuff sheriffs like eil anon or twister. Anyone can do it, but most have the decency not to. Theres enough sheriffs now anyways (and sheriff alts) so 1v4s shouldnt even happen much (unless its me getting outnumbered.. i enjoy it :V).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #8 Hitchens, Jul 1, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 1, 2017
  10. Droiid

    Droiid Shutdown

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2016
    Messages:
    547
    Ratings:
    +159
    Discord:
    Droiid#0609
    Exactly, thinking of it in a realistic perspective as well, you shouldn't be able to walk up to someone in the middle of then fight and instantly handicap them of movement. It's completely unrealistic
     
  11. NickManEA

    NickManEA Build JMOD

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2015
    Messages:
    1,498
    Ratings:
    +717
    Discord:
    NickManEA#1421
    I think I am getting the point of it. +1.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  12. Fadaad8

    Fadaad8 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    546
    Ratings:
    +140
    Well true i guess +1 from me too, but even if like 5 people just got sheriff still like 75% of all sheriffs never come on and and new sheriffs come on now and then, but hope you new sheriffs don't get 5v1! (unless of course you want that or you go wg when team XO is on...)
     
  13. Tjocko

    Tjocko Wild West Ex-MOD

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2016
    Messages:
    320
    Ratings:
    +255
    +2 because my mum agreed on this.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. Carnotauros

    Carnotauros Raid & Events Manager

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    1,496
    Ratings:
    +595
    Discord:
    Leon#9397
  15. TwisterPvP

    TwisterPvP Raid Mod / Squirtle

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    Messages:
    322
    Ratings:
    +68
    -1

    It is a sheriffs duty to protect the world from rogues and anybody performing illegal activities. If there is a team of 5, all rogue, at Wild Grass then the sheriff would have a better chance of getting a couple of ninja-cuffs off before the team reacts. This means that the team always has to be vigilant and gives a better balance to the game.

    If we are to KOS any rogues, then many newer players will also get killed by us, so this doesn't solve the problem of helping newer players perform well and obtain diamond goodies.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. Hitchens

    Hitchens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,392
    Ratings:
    +413
    Protect who?

    Sheriffs arent suposed to kill a team of 5 alone. Sheriffs shouldnt be superheroes. Thats not fun for the bandits. Instead, there should be enough sheriffs, which is the case atm. If a sheriff can take 5 bandits out alone, what about 5v5?

    Because a team of sheriffs isnt enough for bandits to go "oh maybe I shouldnt afk in the open?"

    Did you just mention balance? Lol. Using your own example, its totes balanced when a sheriff can take 5 out alone when cuffing them.

    Did you just ignore what I told nick? It would benefit noobs, not make it harder for them, as cufferd like you and patryk would be fighting experienced bandits instead. Dont you realize many bandits now refuse to fight you? Making you go for noobs rather than us? Besides how is it easier to mine a smallish bounty, than mining the huge bounty noobs get from all their drugs when cuffing? They wont win either way, and loose more time doing the most booring thing possible if you cuff them.

    If all this is what you want, okay then. Thanks for the input m8.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    #15 Hitchens, Jul 2, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 2, 2017
  17. TwisterPvP

    TwisterPvP Raid Mod / Squirtle

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    Messages:
    322
    Ratings:
    +68
    I don't just use cuffs, so lets not tell lies. But thank you for respecting my opinion.
     
  18. Hitchens

    Hitchens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,392
    Ratings:
    +413
    When did I say that?
     
  19. TwisterPvP

    TwisterPvP Raid Mod / Squirtle

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2016
    Messages:
    322
    Ratings:
    +68
    "cuffdependant sheriff" implies that I rely solely on cuffs.
     
  20. DaddyPurest

    DaddyPurest Ex-Party Mod

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2015
    Messages:
    419
    Ratings:
    +212
    Discord:
    DaddyPurest#5286
    -1
    You need to wait for someone to shoot at you so that you can return fire as a sheriff. This would completely takes the surprise and stress of processing out of the game. Just imagine....a sheriff standing in frount of you in a processor room waiting to be shoot so they could return fire.....yeah no thx
     
  21. Hitchens

    Hitchens Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 21, 2013
    Messages:
    1,392
    Ratings:
    +413
    What? The rule would mean that in case you can shoot (enemy is kos or rogue), it should be used over cuffing. It in no way affects the situation when the enemies arent kos. You can still cuff them in these cases. I dont really see your point here?
    Which doesnt mean u only use them.
     
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Intro Simplestt Intros & Outros May 29, 2018
Showcase A simple frigate MinecraftBuild Apr 23, 2018
Denied Simplestt Sheriff Application Denied Nov 8, 2017
One Simple Question Q & A Mar 5, 2017
Idea Minor Necro Buff [Simple] Capture the Flag Aug 15, 2016
Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...