mandatory proof of proof

he sent a list of IPs that don't work for "no reason whatsoever" privately
not buying it quit being biased christ

deadass you two always try to bull**** your way out of bans which were made for a reason
you can't bull**** your way out of "I sent an IP list to some dude, but don't worry those specific IPs with specific numbers WERE ALL FAKE DON'T WORRY I'M ONLY SAYING IT'S FAKE SO I GET UNBANNED IT'S FINE GO WITH IT"

 

either way triple had the intention of DoXing
he sent tanner the IP list without knowing if they worked, which meant there was a possible chance they still did. I don't know what you're trying to accomplish, you're just justifying his ban even more

this also isn't helping your "going for staff" situation lmao

 

you created the thread because of the triple situation, don't lie

"it's not dox" are you serious
you're sending somebody AN IP LIST
it doesn't matter if he didn't release it publicly he still willingly sent it to somebody we all know is a psychopath who obviously had the intent of harassing the people those IP's belonged to

"get real" cut the bias. and I knew that staff app personality was fake lmao, you just wanted power

 

right right "it wasn't dox"
either way he deserves to be banned, whether the reason for it was wrong or not.
I'm not claiming "untrue ****", I'm claiming what both you and triple have told me so far but in a different manner you've been claiming it. triple got banned for giving out an IP list to a psychopath. that's all there is to it, doesn't matter if it was public or not. quit trying so hard

 

Bring it back to the topic at hand

 

what is it with you and your fancy font

he gave out
an ip list
to a psychopath

that's it, last comment by me in this argument lmao
I'm losing brain cells by the minute each time I see a message from you christ

 

I'll share evidence if I recorded it myself. As for others, I don't think that showing all evidence should be mandatory because some people do like having that anonymity to record and not have the worry about being confronted by the person who was banned, or friends of the person who was banned. I believe people should be secured that anonymity because there are serious risks if people want to hurt the recorder through online means.

I do think people should be allowed to see the incriminating evidence, but that should only happen if the recorder / anyone closely involved in the recording agrees to have the evidence disclosed. If another mod I knew recorded someone I had banned, I would ask the moderator to have their permission before I would send the evidence.

As for the font, it's a personal preference ./shrug

Edit: I told you already to stop with the ban discussion. Take it to PM's please @tallscot @Yorei

 

tagging someone in an edit doesn't work and there's nothing left to discuss

 

^^

 

He sent an IP list in teamspeak. How is that not enough to ban for. Triple knows that he posted it. There was atleast one IP on that list that was still being used.

^ idk what you think, but I think that is enough to ban for.

@Trogy, I rate agree

 

I agree that the proof should be given to the banned player. I was false banned for tracers and it was really hard to get the staff to give me the proof (and then show them it was false). +1

 

At least you had a conversation with staff every time we prove an smod wrong he just logs off .

@Trogy so explain why you and @Eil have 2 different story's .

 

Why would we give the proof if he already has the proof. Triple posted an IP list and afaik, there is a thing called logs. He has the proof saved on his own computer.

 

The original post wasnt about a specific case.