Who are some good whitename players on WarZ? Share opinions

I think its sad how whitenames are considered different people. It's actually borderline racist... :/

Anyways, you guys are talking about how so and so is a good whitename because he/she killed this MVP. Killing doesn't define how good you are. It actually defines how much of a terrible person you are. Being good at WarZ is so much more than that. Sure, being able to win fights by killing others is important, but the senseless slaughtering of others is how most players determine how "good" others are. In my opinion, good WarZ players are players who can stay alive for long periods of time, who can loot well, and win a fair fight. Not comboing, not tping in your army of MVPs to butcher a whitename, not using your e-chest to store your good loot. No. The player who wins a battle in full iron using his wits is a much better player than the one who combos hundreds of freshspawned leathers or whitenames. The player who uses tactics and their surroundings to their advantage is a better player than the one who walks into a room in full D with Tier IV weapons. I don't care if the whitenamed player who wins a fair fight only wins one in ten battles. They are still "better" than the MVP who wins all his fights due to unfair advantages. A good whitename isn't just someone who kills. It's someone who only kills to survive.

Sorry for the inspirational speech. Anyways, I just wanted to let you know that I, a whitename, should not be called so as a derogatory term. I actually take pride in being a whitename because I don't buy in to the pay2win setup. I'm not saying that its bad, Brawl needs money, but because I can still survive without paid for advantages, I believe that I could be classified as a "good whitename player" along with the rest of us.

 

tl;dr

Anyways, are you talking about whitenames that have had donor ranks before? If that's the case:
@edin61265
@nicolecacola

If you're talking about whitenames that've never had donor ranks, I don't even know.

 

The problem is that most good players know they are skilled, and so they but MVP. This is why many whitenames are considered inexperienced. All I is, is stereotypes. A stereotypical whitename is what MVPs think of as a roamer and looter. While we think of MVPS as those who are aggressive, and fighters. As far as best whitename goes, I'd say all whitenames who can last solo against a team are good. Other than that a lot is opinion as to who you believe is good.

 

Yeah I agree the main reason why whitenames are judged so much is due to the fact that new players are inexperienced so they ammuse people who all have whitenames are bad

 

As1ansk1lls

 

I'd say this randy named @TheSinisterOne o.o

Or @Nunyabizniz :v

 

oobuck?

 

As1anSk1lls or Sxnd