Different Ranks idea?

I like this idea, but I have a question. Does this mean that if somebody had 300 kills, but only 30 wins, they would be Gold I rank?

Spoiler: What I thought of when I saw this

 

I like it, might make it more competitive.

 

I like the idea, however I think the number of wins for each rank might need to be lowered, because at 300 kills you definitely have <50 wins (unless the game has changed and people just win more now, but I made it over 400 kills before hitting 50 wins).

 

I just added up the total number of kills on the top 50 leaderboard and also added up the total number of wins on the leaderboard. After dividing the kills by the wins, I found that the calculated number of kills per win was 8.283. I guess we could round that down to 8 or so.

I think the kill counts on your ranking system are good numbers that people will try to attain, so we can just change the win numbers.
Bronze: 2-3 wins, Silver: 4-5 wins, Gold I: 11-12 wins, Gold II: 18-19 wins, Gold III: 24-25

For Royal and Professional, it may be better to reduce the number of kills per wins, because you are generally going to get more talented players at this level who are good enough to earn wins without the high number of kills (iMadeAThing, for example, has a kill-to-win ratio of just over 4).

That being said, we could bring the kill-to-win ratio down to around 6-7 (just guessing here, idk if there is a better number).
So Royal: 75-80 wins? And for Professional: 135-140 I guess, no one has reached these numbers in-game so the trend may not continue as it did throughout the lower ranks.

 

yes pls @Signatured