1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

my SMG revisions

Discussion in 'Ideas' started by 505, May 10, 2014.

Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...
  1. 505

    505 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2013
    Messages:
    1,177
    Ratings:
    +226
    so the SMG's got released and thats awesome but there are a few problems with them.... ammo capacity, damage and firerate problems


    Mac10

    now: 30 shots, insane firerate, horrible damage
    my revision: + 1/2 heart of damage and nerf ammo capacity to 20 (20 is irl capacity)

    MP7

    now: 20 shots, insane firerate, ok damage
    my revision: buff capacity to 40 (40 is irl capacity) and (maybe) nerf firerate by a little

    UMP45
    now: 30 shots, insane firerate, ok damage
    my revision: nerf firerate...ALOT (to about AK firerate) and increase damage by 1 hear per shot

    PP90M1

    now: 50 shots, insane firerate, ok damage
    my revision: nerf capacity to 36 (36 is irl capacity)

    P90

    now: 40 shots, insane firerate, ok damage
    my revision: buff capacity to 50

    I love the smgs right now but really they're just 5 more lementations with weird ammo capacity problems, this is my revisions to make them more realistic
     
  2. chikenanater011

    chikenanater011 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2013
    Messages:
    2,262
    Ratings:
    +433
    No thanks.
    I actually don't think smg's need much changing, I think a few need a damage buff and reload buff that is all.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
Other Futuristic City revisions. Map Submissions May 12, 2018
Moderator Applications: Revisions and Additions Suggestions / Ideas Feb 21, 2015
Tomahawk revisions Ideas Jul 31, 2014
Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...