Let's make war great again

Hi...
1.x = related to gameplay
2.x = other stuff

1.1. No 1 hit kills (except for headshots/shotguns/law) - i think that the difference in damage between skully and famas should be reduced. Iso should just be a version of barret50cal with more ammo in my opinion. (I use iso as my main weapon so no hate plz)

1.2. Decrease in knocback - This would make tame more realistic. Replacing knocback with a 5-15tick long slowness potion could work. Some of you have complained that infect is 2 booring nowadays. I think this could help a little bit.

1.3. Banning all 35+ players for a month (i prefer something not so radical)- I have a bit of statistic here for you (i did not include myself Edit: int the stats):
so this is the statistics off all players in a game yesterday. I have to point out that Lekosa1 would have doubled the amount of kills. I did not believe i would get much out of this little crappy amount of statistic when i collected it. One of the reasons was that i could impossibly collect the amount of kills and deaths during 1 game by all players. But i was still able to get somthing out of it. The total kdr of all active players was around 1(a bit greater than 1 ofc... or lets say atleast under 2) when war was a new and growing game (i do not have statistics to prove this). This was likely true mainly because of the flow of new players. A more important point is that the ratio between low level and high level players was much closer to zero in the old days. This means that low level players killed other low level players much more often. All this means that the game was much more beginner friendly in the past. I know that banning all high lewel players for a month sounds like a bad idea, but is there other ways to solve this problem? i hope there are. 1.4 might work aswell.

1.4. War reset, why not? (excluding donor weapons ofc) - Less op guns = more fun for newbies

1.5 new guns - lvl 41/60+ players do not have much to play for. / the fact that donor items will soon be purchasable with credits might solve this problem.

2.1 the 60+ tag should be yellow & the 30+ tag should be grey

2.2 The book should be updated

 

Ah forgot
2.3 I do not know how to solve this, but i've however seen some low lvl guys playing alone at war server when there's another with 25 players. This means that the guy does not now that there's 4 war servers/do not how to select wich war server he joins/or something else.

Edit: Qouted the wrong posrt sorry. My intention was to qoute @ObamaTheReptile

The problem i presented in 1.3 must be solved. War 2.0 will not be able to gain a much greater playerbase unless its solved. Please, come up with your own solutions. Let's make war great again.

Graz you have worked your way to lvl 70 on a dying server. Wouldn't it be nicer to play on a server thats growing, even if you it means that you guns and lvls are resetted (not the rest of the stats).

Pss. It would be nice to have a 30day/1week/1day leaderboard as wildwest.... or actually forever/3day/1week/1day

I like this idea. 2.3 must be solved before this is added.

 

Oh goshmy memory is 'orrible

I'm against opposition in the sense that i hate opposition without arguments. And i also think that the arguments should be tested.

I'm not evn sure myseld whether a reset would be a good thing in my opinion.

My point in 1.3 is that we have a base of skilled quickscopers and other terrible people who makes the game insanely much harder at low levels and therefore makes the game less enjoyable for new players. So in other words we have a community that blocks new members from joining it. This problem must be solved or war will never be that popular again. So the question is (in my opinion) whether the community is willing suffer a bit in order to make war great again. I believe that the issue can be solved in a more effective way. So please, lets try to come up with better ideas.

 

What i am saying is that the game is ultra-hard for new people. That means that they will leave. Wich means that the dying base will not regrow.

I did not mean that you don't have arguments. The reason i argue is that i want to test the arguments on both sides (of this issue). Which i think i am doing. I'm challenging yours here, and i hope others will challenge my. And honestly, thanks for challenging my opinion.

Ps. Correct you listed them.