1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

Autobans and a Temporary Fix

Discussion in 'Suggestions / Ideas' started by Jeaton, Feb 25, 2018.

Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...
  1. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    Made this thread a while ago if you want to read: https://www.brawl.com/threads/71454/

    Another poor part of the punishment system is the anticheat.

    Everyone knows that the anticheat is 100% unreliable. You cannot use a player's autobans as proof of them cheating, and you cannot use a clean punishment page as proof that a player is legit. I don't see a new anticheat getting developed anytime soon, so: Requesting to disable autobans for oneself should be available to regular/trusted players.

    Pros of this change:
    - Less false bans
    - Anticheat false bans will no longer interrupt and ruin gameplay, such as a CTF scrimmages and killstreaks
    - Removing an unnecessary chore from the staff's current list of tasks

    Cons of this change:
    - Players will (rarely) bypass the autoban while actually cheating

    I've asked a few people and that singular con seems to be skewing their opinion on the idea.

    Why this con does not matter whatsoever:
    - Since this would have to be requested by a regular/trusted player, the amount of players that would actually come back to cheat after getting an autoban pass is minuscule
    - If a player had the patience to make this request, then they have patience to come back and cheat 12 hours after their ban has been lifted anyway
    - The newcomer/random cheaters that join just to bhop for a few minutes will still be banned at the same pace
    - Cheaters bypass the anticheat anyway
    - Logs of possible cheaters will still be available
    - Said logs are useless anyway since the anticheat is not reliable

    I've gotten three very high kit killstreaks wiped because of a false anticheat ban. I know I'm not the only one. Been meaning to make this thread for a while.

    Edit: Brawl's policy puts privacy before justice (screensharing). It wouldn't be a big deal to put a bit of effort into making your most regular and innocent players the benefit of not being false auto-banned when doing something important game-wise.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
  2. xGhale

    xGhale HG‘s Doom guy

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,904
    Ratings:
    +1,393
    So we basically have people complaining about not having enough staff and now people asking for a major part of the punishment system to be removed.

    Great.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  3. Chilled_67

    Chilled_67 Lizard

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2015
    Messages:
    624
    Ratings:
    +351
    Discord:
    Chilled_67#5014
    Thats not what he is saying.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  4. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    Oh let him be, he'll say anything to spite my little random cheating self!

    Since when were consistent false bans beneficial to the server? I in no way suggested to remove the anticheat. I very clearly explained how to minimize false bans while keeping the few positive traits that Brawl's anticheat has just to appeal to people like you.

    Ah but we can't have suggestions from cheaters.
     
  5. xGhale

    xGhale HG‘s Doom guy

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,904
    Ratings:
    +1,393
    Did you even read my post before devolving back to an argument that I tried to settle long ago, something that I didn't see as too relevant on your staff app which was where it was brought up?

    Anyways, on the thread topic - personally the BrawlBot does a lot of work and should not be removed due to it detecting the problematic blatant late-night hackers well.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    Well if you read my post, I did not suggest to remove the anticheat in any way.
     
  7. xGhale

    xGhale HG‘s Doom guy

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,904
    Ratings:
    +1,393
    BrawlBot is what automatically bans players. If you only have the anticheat that doesn't ban, what's the point again?
     
  8. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    I said several times, that regular and trusted players should be able to request that the anticheat doesn't ban themselves specifically. Never did I say "disable the anticheat for everyone".

    Now I'd appreciate it if you removed your replies so that my thread isn't cluttered with your ignorance.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. xGhale

    xGhale HG‘s Doom guy

    Joined:
    May 18, 2015
    Messages:
    2,904
    Ratings:
    +1,393
    Alright lemme just go through some ghostclient bans - most of them were assumed to be legit for the longest time.

    Also no need to spread your salt onto my lawn, calm down.
     
  10. Spades_

    Spades_ Former CTF Mod

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2016
    Messages:
    793
    Ratings:
    +229
    What qualifies as regular and trusted? What if it turns out that a regular and trusted player is hacking? I was never a fan of "They've been here longer, so there's no way they could be hacking" if that were put I place, it would show bias towards banning players. Regarding bans, everyone should be banned without a pretense or bias towards them. False bans are bound to happen, mods are only human and there is no perfect solution.

    Furthermore, brawls anti cheat isn't perfect, however it is more reliable then most servers I've played on. I never really got the whole false banning thing because I was never false banned. (I was legitimately banned before though) improvements could be made, but I don't think it's a major issue at the moment.

    Edit: Screensharing would help, there are loopholes around screensharing, but that's no reason not to conduct them. Maybe the mod could ask for a screenshare, if the person in question refuses then the ban would be based on the evidence gathered in game.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Chilled_67

    Chilled_67 Lizard

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2015
    Messages:
    624
    Ratings:
    +351
    Discord:
    Chilled_67#5014
    Anyone who is a regular and gets autobanned will appeal anyways.

    If someone is using a ghost client, or something similar, an anti cheat is certainly not going to be able to accurately detect it. The anticheat is really only good for detecting extremely blatant hackers. This idea just makes it easier for regulars who don't necessarily have to deal with false autos, as well as saving staff time doing appeals.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    #11 Chilled_67, Feb 25, 2018
    Last edited: Feb 25, 2018
  12. Sayan

    Sayan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2015
    Messages:
    541
    Ratings:
    +153
    Autoban should be disabled after a certain playtime. Making and waiting for appeals is a pain.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    If someone is a regular and they're cheating, autobans will never keep them perm banned. Mods will HAVE to make the final decision. So really, the autoban is pointless for closet cheaters too. It just makes the innocent suffer as well.

    Also this thread was about the anticheat, not staff.

    You know some people know how to replicate and purposely get banned by the anticheat, right?
     
  14. AnimeLoverVerlyn

    AnimeLoverVerlyn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,331
    Ratings:
    +681
    They'll get unbanned when they decide to appeal. If you haven't noticed, everyone gets unbanned from autobans if they appeal, it's just a matter of if someone gets to it before the ban runs out.
    The staff team is already stretched perilously thin, so there's no way that the staff team would have enough resources to start following a screensharing protocol. Furthermore, because it goes against the morality of a few higher-up staff members, the idea is borderline impossible until they decide to step down.

    Just as there's no point in reliably using the anti-cheat, there is also no point in making people exempt from it. If you get auto'd, appeal. Simple as that.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    The staff team is stretched perilously thin as you say, yet you don't jump at the idea of reducing their task load? And there is a point. I do not enjoy getting false banned, even if it is as simple as appealing.
     
  16. AnimeLoverVerlyn

    AnimeLoverVerlyn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,331
    Ratings:
    +681
    The way I see it, integrating an anticheat bypass system would require more time. Not only will staff be wasting their time exempting people from BrawlBot who may not ever be autobanned, but it would also require a developer to actually do something. Fat chance.
     
  17. Speedcell

    Speedcell Ex-Raid Mod | Team Vanta

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2016
    Messages:
    603
    Ratings:
    +315
    Discord:
    Speedcell#8433
    "Players will (rarely) bypass the autoban while actually cheating"

    The ratio of kids flying around using kill aura is at least 1 every 10 minutes. Yeah, disable Brawbot's auto bans so your killstreaks don't get ruined.
     
  18. AnimeLoverVerlyn

    AnimeLoverVerlyn Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2016
    Messages:
    1,331
    Ratings:
    +681
    That's not what he's suggesting...
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. Jeaton

    Jeaton Member

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2017
    Messages:
    59
    Ratings:
    +12
    No, the ratio of REGULAR PLAYERS that have REQUESTED to have the autoban PERSONALLY disabled for them are about 1 in almost never. I would have assumed that at least a moderator would've actually read my post before responding with something that silly, but I always forget these are Brawl moderators...
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  20. 0racle

    0racle Former Raid and Reports Manager

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2014
    Messages:
    2,051
    Ratings:
    +744
    I personally don't like this. What's preventing a player from earning trust, getting the brawlbot disabled, then hacking when no staff are on? There are way too many flaws in this imo, and could cause massive issues regarding bias etc etc. Tbh, I think getting banned until you appeal it is a reasonable sacrifice for how good brawlbot is as a staff tool - which ultimately benefits the players. And yes, I understand that you aren't saying you want it removed completely - not sure why that arose.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
About autobans. Suggestions / Ideas Jul 15, 2021
About the false autobans... Raid Aug 23, 2019
False Autobans? Raid Mar 30, 2019
Autobans Suggestions / Ideas Aug 25, 2016
Autobans Capture the Flag Apr 24, 2016
Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...