Idea Will Chemist be a bow user? (spoiler)

I agree, it's a cool effect but I don't see any reason why Chemist would or should be reworked to add it.

 

Archer buff and nerf?

 

Nice idea but the potions would effect anyone, so you could potentially poison your team mates...

 

Isn't that good though?

Perfect nerf for ctf, all the hate pls.

 

Bows are slow to draw: I'd rather see this for elf

 

I no have elf

 

Can CTF just stay in 1.8? Please? Either way you can probably make a plugin for potion dipped arrows.

 

Assassin becomes OP or UP, depending on how they code it.

 

Chemist is a class that revolves around potions, why change it to revolve around arrows?

 

Because 2 arrow classes aren't enough?.. :3
IDK

 

There's more than two arrow classes?

Let's see:

• Pyro
• Archer
• Mage
• Elf
• Engineer

I'm probably missing one as well.

 

I was stating out the main ones ;o pyro, mage and engineer are not really mainly archer based, engineer is turrets, not using a bow, mage is spells, not using a bow, pyro is MEH in the arrow class not really IN IT.

 

They all use arrows, your point makes no sense. Arrows are main functions of all those classes. If you mean bow classes, then you are much closer. However, I don't think having only 3 classes of a type is a reason to make a class of that type. Especially since 'bow' doesn't say anything about that class. We should focus more on roles, or play styles. For example, there are only two mid-ranged classes - mage and elf (unless, of course, if you include engie).

 

u make no sense D:

 

What doesn't make sense?

 

u no make sense to turtle D: turtle no have g00d brain

 

The post makes perfect sense when I read it back to myself. I am saying that 'bow' is a vague term, and instead we should create a class based on a role, such as recovery or support.

 

u no get joke.