Archer (and Elf) Survey [For science!]

I'm in top 5 bets math in my year and decent St archer so maybe it works.

 

if you're going to use this for a school project, only the options listed will probably not prove anything worth noting as evidence for a claim.

your sample size is only the people good at archer. say you get a clear correlation between good archers and good math grades. great, that proves that good maths = good block game sniping. except it doesn't.

if you're not even going to look at the other end of the scale, you might see that the worst archers are also good at maths, and maybe the people you're surveying are all good at maths. on the other hand, if you survey good/bad archers and see a clear trend, then your evidence is a lot more trustworthy.

not to mention countless other variables that may affect someone's archery skill. ping, experience, playtime, and personal opinion of what qualifies as "good" or "bad" at archer. someone may consider themselves very good while another better player considers them to be trash. the same applies for math skill. different schools have different standards, and an 87% on one school's test could be a 40% on a higher-standard school's test.

 

I'm bad as an archer and bad at math but I don't see the option :v

 

this survey is subjective, and so the results of it are pointless!!!!

 

LOL I suk at math yall.

 

The subjectivity wasn't the only thing I pointed out in my post. If you don't have a proper argument to make, don't make one.

 

Okay, that explains your skill with archer :33

 

"throwing a football"
You kick a football
But anyway i can se where you are coming from with the math and playing archer

 

How I aim a bow isn't to do with math at all. I create a virtual reality using my 3D imagination demonstrating the trajectory of the arrow according to the factors I give it such as distance to travel, bow drawback and the speed of the moving target. That's also what I do when I play badmington. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't, but most of the time, if I put enough concentration in it and take time to analyze the demonstration in my head and maybe view it again if the statistics are changed, I can hit the target most of the time. It also works well with short/mid-range shooting, but I go through the aiming proccess much quicker and may or may not hit a tiny bit less.

 

This is a pretty cool experiment, but I proved the hypothesis wrong, majorly. I'm great at math, but am a horrible archer. Not a bad hypothesis though!

 

I just spray and pray tbh.

 

I hope you realize I'm messing with you x3

 

The problem with this survey is that you also have to account for the small amount of randomized arrow drop on each and every individual shot.

Although I'm very good at archer (*toot* *toot*) and pretty good at math, it's not like I'm calculating force vectors in my head on every shot, it's more just a practiced knowledge of a player's top speed and the arrow's approximate ballistic trajectory to the point where it's unconscious knowledge of how much lead each shot needs. Every archer who's played for at least a month or two has this knowledge drilled into their brains from countless shots.

Predictable players to shoot at helps a lot too

 

You monster... - Glad0s

I'm good with archer and i'm decent at math :l

 

Oh, I didn't even see your previous quote. XDddd

 

Just want to warn you that if this is a attempt to get a survey to replace a IRL Archer survey, you'll get it all wrong, as Minecraft Archery is much MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH easier than IRL archery.