1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

Should we Update to 1.9?

Discussion in 'Capture the Flag' started by RaZeragon, Jul 23, 2015.

?

Update or no Update?

  1. Update to 1.9

    22 vote(s)
    43.1%

  2. Stay in 1.8

    29 vote(s)
    56.9%
Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...
Page 2 of 3
  1. lnformative

    lnformative Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    Messages:
    568
    Ratings:
    +193
    what duke said.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #21 lnformative, Jul 23, 2015
  2. misterslime

    misterslime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2015
    Messages:
    417
    Ratings:
    +40
    it will finally remove soldier wall-climbing (ctf is down)
     
    #22 misterslime, Jul 23, 2015
  3. RHCube

    RHCube Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2015
    Messages:
    145
    Ratings:
    +6
    Change is good.
     
    #23 RHCube, Jul 23, 2015
  4. onepunchmeme

    onepunchmeme Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,101
    Ratings:
    +541
    *updates to 1.9
    *entire server is broken
    *entire ctf community bashes on nom
    *nom commits suicude

    ^ reason why updating is a very bad idea
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    #24 onepunchmeme, Jul 23, 2015
  5. DJ_V5th

    DJ_V5th Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2015
    Messages:
    506
    Ratings:
    +94
    my answer no thx
    the 1.8 update made it more difficult to fight against assassins
    1.9 will be again a change of the pvp
    btw how do u want to make a shield in survival (singleplayer)
    does the shield uses a slot or not
    it will be a chaos :frowning:
     
    #25 DJ_V5th, Jul 23, 2015
  6. SoCool21

    SoCool21 Bans Reports & Appeals Admin | McPvPer for Life <3

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,096
    Ratings:
    +2,517
    According to a tweet by one of the Mojang peeps, it is.

    Anyways, I don't see how CTF will have to be "re-made". Add shields to all classes (apart from Pyro, as it can't block now and giving it a shield will allow it to block), and the rest of the features practically do not change the game at all.
     
    #26 SoCool21, Jul 23, 2015
  7. __Mountaindew__

    __Mountaindew__ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2015
    Messages:
    188
    Ratings:
    +85
    Or just not add any shields for now and remake/tweak assassin... that could work
     
    #27 __Mountaindew__, Jul 23, 2015
  8. SoCool21

    SoCool21 Bans Reports & Appeals Admin | McPvPer for Life <3

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,096
    Ratings:
    +2,517
    It'd be a lot easier to just add shields for now - assassin isn't the next to rework and since I think 1.9 will be released over summer I doubt there'll be much time to rework soldier, pyro and chemist then assassin. Adding shields will be mandatory until assassin gets reworked.
     
    #28 SoCool21, Jul 23, 2015
  9. Turmac

    Turmac Hardcore Games Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2015
    Messages:
    1,218
    Ratings:
    +765
    It really would be a pain to switch from 1.8 to play one of brawls servers, and then to 1.9 to play the others.
     
    #29 Turmac, Jul 23, 2015
  10. slayerage

    slayerage Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    107
    Ratings:
    +34
    CTF is still in beta so it would be a long time until it's moved onto 1.9
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    #30 slayerage, Jul 23, 2015
  11. lasertagfighter

    lasertagfighter Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    490
    Ratings:
    +74
    How about this: new classes/maps could have some of the 1.9 changes. Like, if scout is going to be made, you could make it have 2 weapons at a time or an ability you can use while wielding a sword. I'm going to look up 1.9 and see the new mc. I shall not let CTF change that much!
     
    #31 lasertagfighter, Jul 23, 2015
  12. Recovs

    Recovs Unknown Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    405
    Ratings:
    +196
    I personally wouldn't update ctf to 1.9. Even though the rest of brawl does go to 1.9 and ctf stays on 1.8, how would you lose members because of this? You can always have 2 mc files you can switch off from 1.9 to 1.8 to play ctf.
     
    #32 Recovs, Jul 23, 2015
  13. EmperorTrump45

    EmperorTrump45 Dank Memer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2015
    Messages:
    2,796
    Ratings:
    +2,157
    That makes no sense. Why not just make Assassin a priority to rework instead of adding shields to all the classes and then taking light years to rework Assassin for the sake of keeping in line with current priorities? If blocking is going to be gone then I think reworking Assassin, a class whose only counter is blocking, should be a pretty big priority :stuck_out_tongue:
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #33 EmperorTrump45, Jul 23, 2015
  14. RTKno1

    RTKno1 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    168
    Ratings:
    +101
    Discord:
    RTKno1#2640
    can we go back to stuff before 1.6 xD everything for me went down after that update >.<
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    #34 RTKno1, Jul 23, 2015
  15. pookeythekid

    pookeythekid Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 19, 2015
    Messages:
    979
    Ratings:
    +245
    Eh, I'm with the shields idea. It can't be hard to add one shield to each class at least as a temporary fix, and in my opinion, Assassin is in no immediate need for a rework.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    #35 pookeythekid, Jul 24, 2015
  16. Daveeeeeeeee

    Daveeeeeeeee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    4,309
    Ratings:
    +876
    Maybe 1 server so like CTF#4 could be 1.9 and see how it is.
     
    #36 Daveeeeeeeee, Jul 24, 2015
  17. TOM_SAYS

    TOM_SAYS Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2015
    Messages:
    416
    Ratings:
    +44
    Yes we should definetly do this! as @NomNuggetNom stated, we are not going to stay in 1.8 forever.
     
    #37 TOM_SAYS, Jul 24, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Jul 24, 2015
  18. SoCool21

    SoCool21 Bans Reports & Appeals Admin | McPvPer for Life <3

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,096
    Ratings:
    +2,517
    Right now would be the best time to update to 1.9 - if something bad happens, who cares, its in beta so they'll expect it to happen.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    #38 SoCool21, Jul 24, 2015
  19. AriesRam10

    AriesRam10 Old MCPVP'er

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    293
    Ratings:
    +75
    I would rather make an Assassin rework priority, because giving a shield to every class would be dumb IMO.

    Heavy, sure.
    Soldier, maybe.. Not sure how I feel about that one.
    Archer, no. Archers dont use shields.
    Medic, maybe..
    Ninja, no.
    Assassin, no.
    Pyro, no.
    Engineer, I wouldent think so
    Chemist, no.
    Necro, no.
    Mage, no.
    Elf, no.
    Dwarf, sure.

    I think I got all the classes, but IMO a shield dosent really fit the feel of most classes..
     
    • Like Like x 2
    #39 AriesRam10, Jul 24, 2015
  20. SoCool21

    SoCool21 Bans Reports & Appeals Admin | McPvPer for Life <3

    Joined:
    May 17, 2015
    Messages:
    6,096
    Ratings:
    +2,517
    All classes apart from Pyro have the ability to block, which is everything the shield is going to give.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    #40 SoCool21, Jul 24, 2015
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 2 of 3
Loading...
Similar Threads Forum Date
[Update] /t - The Way It Should Be Raid Apr 28, 2017
What the Minecraft 1.9 update should have added. Discussion Mar 14, 2016
Why Brawl Should NOT update to 1.9 Discussion Feb 23, 2016
Clans should have some use into them! (war 2.0 update) Ideas Dec 9, 2015
2 Updates on What I believe should be done Suggestions / Ideas Jun 10, 2015
Thread Status:
Please be aware that this thread is more than 30 days old. Do not post unless the topic can still be discussed. Read more...