1. Welcome to the Brawl website! Feel free to look around our forums. Join our growing community by typing /register in-game!

Comments on Profile Post by iMacro

  1. View previous comments
  2. GlobalistCuck
    GlobalistCuck
    @nimai108 I'm sorry but do you have a hard time understanding simple concepts? THESE MOTHERS DO NOT WANT TO HAVE THESE BABIES. OK? IT WAS NOT IN THE POWER TO NOT HAVE A A BABY AND NOW THEY WANT AN ABORTION. OK? I don't know how you can't understand that.. If there was no such thing as rape and if conception was used by everyone, then we wouldn't need abortions.
    Feb 11, 2016
  3. GlobalistCuck
    GlobalistCuck
    Guys the bottom line is that when a mother has an abortion, she's not hurting anyone is she? So why do guys have this idea that it should be illegal? You can talk about human rights but we have far too many humans as it is, and an unborn fetus in early pregnancy isn't much of an alive human being.
    Feb 11, 2016
  4. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    Skull, stop being a hypocrite. You called me rude and you went off and did it yourself.

    Let's move on


    TO GUN CONTROL
    Feb 11, 2016
  5. EmperorTrump45
    EmperorTrump45
    Hey anyone want to talk about how terrorists and Syrian refugees are a significant threat to America while over 30,000 people a year die in America due to gun violence?
    Feb 11, 2016
  6. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    Most of those are due to suicides. Those that aren't are due in part to homicides which could be prevented by the victims having firearms.
    Feb 11, 2016
  7. EmperorTrump45
    EmperorTrump45
    Roughly 60% of gun violence deaths in America are due to suicides. That is still 10,000 plus people who are killed in non suicide gun violence in America. Now you can either treat that problem by giving people more guns or you can treat the underlying issues of all the violence which include the shameful state of the mental healthcare in America and working class wages.
    Feb 11, 2016
  8. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    Do both. Mental health systems are crap, but if a psycho gets a gun and starts shooting it's too late to sit them down on the couch and ask what's wrong. Everyone has the right to defend themselves and not have their second amendment violated. It's insane that one can't have a weapon for self defense in Australia. That's wrong for us and that goes against the spirit of our constitution.
    Feb 11, 2016
  9. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    And working class wages have little do do with this, but since you brought it up, if the minimum wage goes up by more than $3, unemployment will skyrocket and all our jobs (metaphorically) will fly out of the country to China.
    Feb 11, 2016
  10. EmperorTrump45
    EmperorTrump45
    The constitution simply guarantees the right to bear arms, it does not specify what type, and that is up to the politicians to interpret.
    Feb 11, 2016
  11. EmperorTrump45
    EmperorTrump45
    I hope you don't really believe what you just said about the minimum wage because that is a naive and incredibly false statement.
    Feb 11, 2016
  12. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    1. Who's gonna pay an American worker 15 dollars an hour? Some people don't deserve that for the work they do.
    2. The constitution verbatim states "form militias" meaning armed citizens defending themselves. Everyone has a right to self defense with a firearm unless they are a criminal or ill.
    Feb 11, 2016
  13. EmperorTrump45
    EmperorTrump45
    Your argument against an actual starter wage instead of the current minimum wage - which is essentially a slave wage - is ridiculous. Just because some people do not do particularly meaningful work in your eye does not mean that the whole should see their wages depressed. Also, the poor wages in America are deeply connected to the violence when you consider that poor living almost always breeds a lot of discontent,
    Feb 11, 2016
  14. EmperorTrump45
    EmperorTrump45
    and a great deal of discontent creates a lot of violence. Look at Mexico.
    Feb 11, 2016
  15. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    So we should ba roll the poor to the point where they have no motivation to benefit themselves? No. Benjamin Franklin agreed. I'll link the quote with my next post. I make 12.5 dollars an hour for a part time job and it is WAY too much money. I'd be fine with 10, but in my opinion the cost of living should barely be covered by minimum wage. There's no need to reward people who can only get a low level job.
    Feb 11, 2016
  16. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    Sure, give them tax breaks but don't pay people for being poor.
    Feb 11, 2016
  17. Sir_Inge
    Sir_Inge
    It is best for all to leave each man free to acquire property as fast as he can. Some will get wealthy. I don't believe in a law to prevent a man from getting rich; it would do more harm than good. ~ Abraham Lincoln
    Feb 11, 2016
  18. Sir_Inge
  19. Webmant
    Webmant
    Since I have proposed and began the topic of abortion, I believe I should be capable to contribute to its discussion, which I did not have the chance to do so. I have a secular, scientific, and logical view upon abortion and I will explain it with due detail as well as address the religious view upon abortion.
    Feb 11, 2016
  20. Webmant
    Webmant
    I am against the slaughter of any innocent and sentient living being, be it an animal or human. However, I am not against the slaughter of non-sentient living beings, such as plants. Applying this to the fetus, we must first determine whether or not a fetus is sentient.
    Feb 11, 2016
  21. Webmant
    Webmant
    According to various studies, the cerebral cortex is the center of sentience and consciousness. Without it, one's ability to experience, think, feel, and be conscious fades away. This turns them, mentally, to the state of vegetation.
    Feb 11, 2016
  22. Webmant
    Webmant
    In a fetus, the development of the cerebral cortex to the point of achieving sentience is not achieved before the second half of the second trimester. Typically, the sensory structures located within the brain of a fetus are not developed enough to feel pain or achieve sentience before 24 weeks.
    Feb 11, 2016
  23. Webmant
    Webmant
    By the third trimester, a fetus has fully wrested control over sentience. They begin to feel, dream, think, and more.
    Feb 11, 2016
  24. Webmant
    Webmant
    With this knowledge (albeit not fully realized), we should allow abortions up until half the duration of a typical pregnancy has passed since sentience rarely, if ever, occurs in a fetus before the late second half of the second trimester.
    Feb 11, 2016
  25. Webmant
    Webmant
    Now, to address the religious reasons behind abortions. My knowledge of the Judeo-Christian and Islam scripture also allows me to apply it to the topic of abortion, giving Jews, Christians, and Muslims no real reason to oppose abortion. I shall present my evidence through way of quotations.
    Feb 11, 2016
  26. Webmant
    Webmant
    "The priest shall say unto the woman, The LORD make thee a curse and an oath among thy people, when the LORD doth make thy thigh to rot, and thy belly to swell. And this water that causeth the curse shall go into thy bowels, to make thy belly to swell, and thy thigh to rot: And the woman shall say, Amen, amen."
    Feb 11, 2016
  27. Webmant
    Webmant
    "And when he hath made her to drink the water, then it shall come to pass, that, if she be defiled, and have done trespass against her husband, that the water that causeth the curse shall enter into her, and become bitter, and her belly shall swell, and her thigh shall rot: and the woman shall be a curse among her people. And if the woman be not defiled, but be clean; then she shall be free, and shall conceive seed."
    Feb 11, 2016
  28. Webmant
    Webmant
    Numbers 5:21-21, 27-28
    Feb 11, 2016
  29. Webmant
    Webmant
    Through the examination of this passage found in the Old Testament (therefore applying to Jews, Christians, and Muslims), we see that there was actually some form of abortion in the Bible. An abortion typically used to get rid of fetuses that are believed to not be the result of one's husband.
    Feb 11, 2016
  30. Webmant
    Webmant
    This, therefore, validates a woman's right to abortion in all cases so far except through impregnation by one's husband. However, this is not the only quote we can use to support our case.
    Feb 11, 2016
  31. Webmant
    Webmant
    "And if it be from a month old even unto five years old, then thy estimation shall be of the male five shekels of silver, and for the female thy estimation shall be three shekels of silver." -Leviticus 27:6 This suggests that God puts no value upon children, which applies to fetuses as well.
    Feb 11, 2016
  32. Webmant
    Webmant
    "Number the children of Levi after the house of their fathers, by their families: every male from a month old and upward shalt thou number them. And Moses numbered them according to the word of the LORD." -Numbers 3:15-16
    Feb 11, 2016
  33. Webmant
    Webmant
    Numbers 3:15-16 suggests that any child below one month of age is not to be counted in a census, suggesting them not to be a human, at least in the case of a census.
    Feb 11, 2016
  34. Webmant
    Webmant
    "If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. And if any mischief follow, then thou shalt give life for life." -Exodus 21:22-23
    Feb 11, 2016
  35. Webmant
    Webmant
    If a woman is caused a miscarriage by other men, but no harm to her, against her will, they are to be fined. However, if they were to harm the women, they shall be punished life for life, eye for eye, etc. Because the ending of a fetus does not result in punishment by life for life and eye for eye, it suggests that a fetus was not considered a life.
    Feb 11, 2016
  36. Webmant
    Webmant
    Also, the notion of "what could have been" with the birth of a fetus is speculative, foolish, selfish, and ultimately, stupid. Most women who have abortions do not have them "just because." They do it because they won't be able to care for the child, will struggle, are not ready to a bear a child, or will not care for the child. To force the birth of child to such a mother is to doom the child to an awful existence.
    Feb 11, 2016
  37. Webmant
    Webmant
    It is speculative that aborted fetuses "could have" done something great, such as cure cancer or invent something spectacular. A child born to an unwanting mother is not likely to achieve anything. A child born to unwanting surroundings is not likely to achieve anything if they survive. Besides, motion through time is irreversible (as opposed to space; motion through space is reversible).
    Feb 11, 2016
  38. Webmant
    Webmant
    The traveling of matter through time is its being in a constant state of change. As time passes, all matter eventually changes upon all levels (subatomic, molecular, etc.). The changes it goes through due to the time are irreversible. Time is not to be taught of as a wave (time) washing upon hidden rocks (events) that exist independent of the development of time.
    Feb 11, 2016
  39. Webmant
    Webmant
    Because the future does not exist until we are present within it, there is no "what could have been." There is only "what was," "what is," and "what will be." There is no room for "what could have been" since its very existence is an impossibility.
    Feb 11, 2016
  40. Webmant
    Webmant
    We can predict and influence what the future will be, however, we cannot change what the future is when we reach it. We cannot reverse it; it is what it has become.
    Feb 11, 2016
  41. Webmant
    Webmant
    Anyways, if there are no objections or responses to my thoughts on abortion, I will move on to the discussion of the minimum wage, Socialism, and Capitalism so as to contribute to the conversation that @Sir_Inge and @Admiral_Munson were having.
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  42. onepunchmeme
    onepunchmeme
    holy hell what happened here
    Feb 11, 2016
    EmperorTrump45 likes this.
  43. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  44. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  45. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    Leviticus 27:6 does not mean that God does not value children. According to the Bible 1. Humans are created in God’s image. Genesis 1:27 2. Humans are formed by God in the womb. 3. God also knows individual humans before they were even born. Therefore, he considers humans human, even before birth. It’s impossible to claim that God does not value humans. Jeremiah 1:5
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  46. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    The interpretation you gave of Numbers 3:15-16 is wrong viewed in light of the previous evidence.
    I don’t know what translation of the Bible you used for the verses in Exodus.
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  47. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    The NKJV reads, “22 “If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman’s husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  48. onepunchmeme
    onepunchmeme
    HOW ARE YOU TYPING SO FAST
    Feb 11, 2016
  49. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    23 But if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life, 24 eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25 burn for burn, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.”
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  50. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    This Hebrew word here does not denote a dead fetus. Seeing that God knows humans before they are born, the baby here is treated as a human. Should the fetus die, the penalty would have been death.
    https://www.christiancourier.com/articles/786-does-exodus-21-sanction-abortion
    As for all the science-ish stuff you posted, I don’t want to take the time to read and research all that like I did with your biblical stuff.
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  51. randomcitizen1
    randomcitizen1
    For all I know, the sciency stuff could be true. :V That being said, I knew for sure that the Bible could not sanction abortion. Why would the religious people continue to believe what they do if it did?
    Feb 11, 2016
    Sir_Inge likes this.
  52. View most recent comments